Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 711 So. 2d 112 - Johnson v. State

711 So. 2d 112 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2016

8 state decisions

50199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Petition of Graham ex rel. Nine Condemned Men v. State · 472 So. 2d 738 - Williams v. State · Jackson v. State · 499 So. 2d 24 - James v. State · 634 So. 2d 208 - Witherspoon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the judge repeatedly had to instruct [the appellant] in examination techniques and to restrain him from testifying himself when he was supposedly questioning witnesses”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[e]videntiary hearings are adversarial in nature, and the rules of evidence and procedure are mystifyingly complex to all but the most sophisticated non-lawyers”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Though need for an evidentiary hearing does not automatically mandate the appointment of counsel, any doubt must be resolved in favor of the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.