Anderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2012
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Paul v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co. · Melbourne v. State · 476 So. 2d 150 - State v. Marshall · 560 So. 2d 203 - Reed v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[d]enial of appellant's motion for mistrial based on testimonial comment on the defendant's silence must be evaluated under the harmless error doctrine.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The burden is on the state to show beyond a reasonable doubt that there is no reasonable possibility that the error complained of contributed to the conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“any comment on, or which is fairly susceptible of being interpreted as referring to, a defendant's failure to testify is error and strongly discouraged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.