Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 711 SO2D 589 - State v. Summerlot

State v. Summerlot’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Webb · 50 So. 2d 179 - Foley v. State Ex Rel. Gordon · 150 So. 2d 277 - Winnemore v. State · 676 So. 2d 75 - Iglesias v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the state is not required to prove that a defendant `communicated' as a part of a scheme to defraud charged pursuant to section 817.034(4)(a).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]ny person who engages in a scheme to defraud and obtains property thereby is guilty of organized fraud.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.