Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

711 So. 2d 641

Docket No. 97-2756.

Harris v. Webb

Michael O. HARRIS, Appellant, v. James WEBB, Jr., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-06-17

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2008

3 state decisions

Relies on Thompson v. Unterberger · McCaskill v. Dees

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-06-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Michael O. Harris, pro se, appellant.

¶2James H. Webb, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Quincy, pro se, appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Michael O. Harris appeals the denial of his petition for writ of mandamus, in which he sought an order compelling his court-appointed trial counsel to provide him with copies of various documents contained in counsel's file. We affirm the denial of relief except as to appellant's request that he be provided copies of the depositions of the victim and witness Phelps. Appellee's response below acknowledged that transcripts of these depositions had not been furnished to appellant, and to the extent they were prepared at public expense, an order compelling their production was warranted. See McCaskill v. Dees,698 So.2d 628 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Thompson v. Unterberger,577 So.2d 684 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

¶5AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED for further proceedings.

¶6BARFIELD, C.J., and KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

/711/so2d/641 · .json · Public domain