Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 711 SO2D 66 - Wright v. State

Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2012

13 state decisions

90199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. State · Dorfman v. State · 699 So. 2d 1366 - McCray v. State · 488 So. 2d 532 - Florida Bar v. Rightmyer · 543 So. 2d 1244 - In re Amendment to Florida Rules of Judicial Administration-Rule 2.125(b)(1)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he prejudice to the State is likewise apparent as court transcripts are routinely destroyed after 10 years and the State now has no transcript in existence to refute, or prove, Wright's claim”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]here must be some point at which criminal convictions and sentences are final and unassailable”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.