Luedke v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2018
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 158 Tex. Crim. 313 - Hill v. State · Durrough v. State · Gant v. State · Ward v. State · Perez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any person who has been convicted of the misdemeanor offense of driving or operating an automobile or other motor vehicle ... while intoxicated ... and who shall thereafter drive or operate an automobile or other motor vehicle ... while such person is intoxicated ... shall for each and every subsequent such violation be guilty of a felony....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barfield v. State“felony offense of driving while intoxicated is a different offense than misdemeanor driving while intoxicated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Oliva v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.