Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 A2D 1006 - Emerald Partners v. Berlin

Emerald Partners v. Berlin’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1999
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1352

Relies on Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. United States · Byrne v. Karalexis · Matthews v. United States · Coyne-Delany Co. v. Capital Development Board · Lever Bros. v. International Chemical Workers Union, Local 217

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No restraining order or preliminary injunction shall issue except upon the giving of security by the applicant, in such sum as the Court deems proper, for the ■payment of such costs and damages as may be incurred or suffered by any party ioho is found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained. Any security given as a condition to the issuance of a restraining order shall also constitute security for any preliminary injunction subsequently issued and requiring security.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.