Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 A.2d 327 - Commonwealth v. Martir

Commonwealth v. Martir’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2023

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

501998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Anderson · Spring Garden Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Hearing Board of Adjustment of the City of Philadelphia · 345 Pa. Super. 10 - Commonwealth v. Barnhart · Williams v. State · 420 Pa. Super. 311 - Commonwealth v. Cottam

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) the accused must be aware of ... her duty to protect the child; 2) the accused must be aware that the child is in circumstances that could threaten the child’s physical or psychological welfare; and 3) the accused either must have failed to act or must have taken action so lame or meager that such actions cannot reasonably be expected to protect the child’s welfare.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] conviction for reckless endangerment requires proof of conduct that places or may place another person in danger of death or serious bodily injury, while a conviction for endangering the welfare of children only requires proof of circumstances that could threaten the child's physical or psychological welfare. Thus, reckless endangerment requires proof of a fact that endangering the welfare of children does not. In other words, the element of conduct which places or may place a person in danger of death or serious bodily injury is not subsumed within proof that a child is placed in circumstance[s] that could threaten the child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he recklessly engages in conduct which places or may place another person in danger of death or serious bodily injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.