Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 F.2d 1103 - Donovan v. Fall River Foundry Co.

Donovan v. Fall River Foundry Co.’s Empirical Analysis

712 F.2d 1103 · 1983

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
August 1994
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc. · United States v. Christine · West Point-Pepperell, Inc. v. Donovan · Burkart Randall Division of Textron, Inc. v. Marshall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a general warrant is sought, there should be some evidence presented to the magistrate supporting the belief by OSHA that the deleterious conditions may also be present in other portions of the facilities.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “'directly related to the purpose of the inspection.' "). 30 We are of course fully aware that "[d]elineating the scope of a search with some care is particularly important where documents are involved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “OSHA personnel's rummaging through the entire files of a company in order to determine what, if any, information pertinent to the employee complaints might be found.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.