Taylor v. Meirick’s Empirical Analysis
712 F.2d 1112 · 1983
Citation profile
108 federal appellate · 20 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 235 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Roland Machinery Company v. Dresser Industries Inc (1984), Cada v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. (1990)
108 federal appellate · 20 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co. · Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. And Sid & Marty Krofft Productions, Inc. v. McDonald Corporation and Needham, Harper & Steers, Inc., Defendants- Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. And Sid & Marty Krofft Productions, Inc. v. McDonald Corporation and Needham, Harper & Steers, Inc., Defendants · Miller v. Universal City Studios, Inc. · Herman Schwabe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 235 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the wrong is over and done with.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[n]o civil action shall be maintained under the provisions of this title unless it is commenced within three years after the claim accrued.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(b) Actual Damages and Profits. — The copyright owner is entitled to recover ... any profits of the infringer that are attributable to the infringement .... In establishing the infringer’s profits, the copyright owner is required to present proof only of the infringer’s gross revenue, and the infringer is required to prove his or her deductible expenses and the elements of profit attributable to factors other than the copyrighted work.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.