Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 F.2d 1248 - Tusa v. Omaha Auto Auction Inc.

Tusa v. Omaha Auto Auction Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

712 F.2d 1248 · 1983

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
8
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 6 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently August 2009 · most notably Molo Oil Co. v. River City Ford Truck Sales, Inc. (1998), Williams v. Mensey (1986)

26 federal appellate · 6 district · 13 state decisions

310198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1981 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · McGinty v. Beranger Volkswagen, Inc. · Duval v. Midwest Auto City, Inc. · Horner v. Mary Institute

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"If a person lacks knowledge that an odometer disclosure statement is false only because he displays a reckless disregard for the truth, a fact finder can reasonably infer that the violation was committed with an intent to defraud a purchaser."”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) Any person who, with intent to defraud, violates any requirement imposed under this subchapter shall be liable ...”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) Disclosure of the cumulative mileage registered on the odometer. (2) Disclosure that the actual mileage is unknown, if the odometer reading is known to the transferor to be different from the number of miles the vehicle has actually traveled.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.