Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 F.2d 1290 - Pardee v. Stock

Pardee v. Stock’s Empirical Analysis

712 F.2d 1290 · 1983

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
April 1998
most recently cited

23 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · Alabama v. United States · Raymond MOORE, Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS MUSIC SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., Appellee · Texas v. New Jersey · Tolbert v. Leighton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'a clear record of delay or contumacious conduct by the plaintiff.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether in the particular circumstances of the case the needs of the court in advancing a crowded docket and preserving respect for the integrity of its internal procedures are sufficient to justify the harsh consequences of forever denying a litigant his day in court.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'a drastic sanction which should be exercised sparingly.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.