Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 F.2d 1342 - United States v. Samuels, Kramer & Co.

United States v. Samuels, Kramer & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

712 F.2d 1342 · 1983

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
May 2023
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably Ponsford v. United States (1985), United States v. Abrahams (1990)

36 federal appellate · 6 district ·

30019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Powell · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · United States v. National Bank · Ohio State Board of Education v. Reed · Akers v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must show that the investigation will be conducted pursuant to a legitimate purpose, that the inquiry may be relevant to the purpose, that the information sought is not already within the Commissioner [of the IRS’s] possession, and that the administrative steps required by the [IRS] Code have been followed [with respect to issuance and service of the summons].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The IRS is free to serve, without prior judicial approval, a direct summons on any person if the summons is necessary to facilitate the investigation of that person's tax liability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “its use of the summons is 'in good-faith pursuit' of the purposes authorized by Congress,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.