Rogers v. Rulo’s Empirical Analysis
712 F.2d 363 · 1983
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2008 · most notably United States v. Noone (1990), Mike Steven Stidham v. Peace Officer Standards and Training (2001)
26 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Swain v. State of Alabama · Rizzo v. Goode · Smith v. Wade · Johnson v. Glick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of time limit on the plaintiff's case. While a party may believe that it would be futile, so far as the trial court is concerned, to make an objection, and that the objection may irritate the Court, it is still incumbent upon the party to make the objection in order to preserve the issue for appeal. 3 12 Affirmed. 1 The Hon. Warren K. Urbom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska 2 The Fillmore County Hospital was named a defendant in Johnson's complaint but was dismissed before trial 3 Of course, even where there has been no timely objection, we may still review for”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. Ashby
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.