Grunenthal v. Hotz Sa’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2014
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc. · General Electric Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers · Strong v. United States · Parham v. J. L. · IIT v. Cornfeld
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Hotz' conduct in this country was not ‘merely preparatory'; rather, the conduct was 'material' because immediately thereafter defendants signed and plaintiff was induced to execute the agreement.... Moreover, the execution of the agreement in Los Angeles itself constituted an act that strongly supports our assertion of jurisdiction ... [T]he misrepresentation arising from Hotz' presence for the first time, and the actual signing of the agreement were significant, material and in furtherance of the fraudulent scheme.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a high standard of business ethics in the securities industry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.