Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 F.2d 426 - Bialac Harsh Investment Corp v. G Bialac T Bialac Harsh Investment Corp

Bialac Harsh Investment Corp v. G Bialac T Bialac Harsh Investment Corp’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
4
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Lockard Jwl O'Malley Lumber Company v. W Lockard Jwl, Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee of Spaulding Composites Co. (In Re Spaulding Composites Co.) (1997)

3 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions

2701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Houltin v. United States · Segal v. Rochelle · Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co. · City National Bank v. San Clemente Estates (In Re San Clemente Estates) · England v. Industrial Commission of Utah

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the commencement or continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been commenced before the commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this title ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he only time a debtor does not have redemption rights is when the debtor and the owner of the property are not the same person, in which case the owner has the right to redeem.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the automatic stay does not preclude efforts to collect from a bankrupt's guarantors or from their property.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.