Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 F.2d 447 - Pullman v. Chorney

Pullman v. Chorney’s Empirical Analysis

712 F.2d 447 · 1983

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2018

14 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

1101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 30 U.S.C. § 184 · 30 U.S.C. § 226

Relies on Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. Lewis · Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press · California Bankers Assn. v. Shultz · Rawls v. Secretary of the Interior

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a mere proscription of behavior does not justify an inference of a private cause of action for its violation; instead, there must be some evidence that Congress intended one.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Act itself implies that there should be no further private remedy since 30 U.S.C. Sec. 184(h)(1) (1976) authorizes the Attorney General to bring an action for the forfeiture of any lease acquired in violation of the Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “When dispositive, indisputable, alternative grounds appear in the record and are raised on appeal, an appellate court may rely on them to sustain the judgment of the court below.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.