Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 F.2d 490 - Gray III v. Bell

Gray III v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

712 F.2d 490 · 1983

Citation profile

216
cited by 216 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

76 federal appellate · 55 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 216 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2023 · most notably Burns v. Reed (1991), Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug Administration (2005)

76 federal appellate · 55 district · 10 state decisions

92019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Imbler v. Pachtman · Butz v. Economou

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 216 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Prosecutorial decisions as to whether, when and against whom to initiate prosecution are quintessential examples of government discretion ....”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]ny claim based upon ... the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty on the part of a federal agency or an employee of the Government, whether or not the discretion involved be abused.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'[I]nvestigative or law enforcement officer' means any officer of the United States who is empowered by law to execute searches, to seize evidence, or to make arrests for violations of Federal law.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.