Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 F.2d 809 - Arthur v. Nyquist

Arthur v. Nyquist’s Empirical Analysis

712 F.2d 809 · 1983

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
July 2011
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2011

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1601983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. Romeo · Milliken v. Bradley · Rice v. Norman Williams Co. · Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Roberts · George Arthur v. Ewald P. Nyquist

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[sjhould a dispute of this nature recur, we think it will normally be helpful if those who seek a court order for additional funding, and those who oppose such an order, supply the District Court with considerable detail reflecting the proposed expenditures in the absence of the additional funds claimed to be needed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a court must be alert not to permit ... use [of] a court's broad power to remedy constitutional violations as a means of upgrading an educational system in ways only remotely related to desegregation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a remedy for unconstitutional conditions in schools is impermissible if it is addressed to a general improvement in the quality of the local school system.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.