Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 F.2d 854 - Holman v. Hilton

Holman v. Hilton’s Empirical Analysis

712 F.2d 854 · 1983

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
5
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 5 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Davidson v. O'Lone (1984), New York State National Organization for Women v. Pataki (2001)

9 federal appellate · 5 district · 11 state decisions

1301983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4126 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Barker v. Wingo · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Wolff v. McDonnell · Parratt v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No action shall be commenced by or on behalf of a prisoner against a public entity or public employee until such prisoner shall be released from institutional confinement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Ciccolello v. Middlesex County Board of Freeholders · 243 N.J. Super. 439 - Small v. Department of Corrections
  2. “as a general matter, that Sec. 1983 affords a remedy for negligent deprivation of federally protected rights by persons acting under the color of state law,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Davidson v. O'Lone
  3. “tend to increase prison discord by blocking a significant means of orderly dispute resolution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 483 So. 2d 489 - McCuiston v. Wanicka

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.