Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 F.2d 998 - Dunn v. Maggio

Dunn v. Maggio’s Empirical Analysis

712 F.2d 998 · 1983

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently January 2009 · most notably Schwander v. Blackburn (1985), Self v. Blackburn (1985)

19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

250198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Sumner v. Mata · Marshall v. Lonberger · Sumner v. Mata · Maggio v. Fulford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Whenever a prisoner who has been convicted of a crime and sentenced to imprisonment for life, so conducts himself as to merit the approval of the superintendent of the state penitentiary he may apply for a commutation of his sentence and the application, upon approval of the superintendent, shall be forwarded to the governor. The governor may commute the sentence upon the recommendation in writing of the lieutenant governor, attorney general, and presiding judge of the court before which the conviction was had or any two of them. No commutation under this Section shall reduce the period of incarceration to less than ten years and six months.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.