Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Edman Controls, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
712 F.3d 1021 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 201 · 9 U.S.C. § 202 · 9 U.S.C. § 305
Relies on Major League Baseball Players Assn. v. Garvey · Spegon v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago · Pickett v. Sheridan Health Care Center · George Watts & Son, Inc. v. Tiffany & Co. · Wise v. Wachovia Securities, LLC
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]hinly veiled attempts to obtain appellate review of the arbitrator's decision ... [are] not permitted under the FAA. Factual or legal errors by arbitrators-even clear or gross errors-do not authorize courts to annul awards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“arbitrator committed serious error, or the decision is incorrect or even whacky”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.