Jordan v. Binns’s Empirical Analysis
712 F.3d 1123 · 2013
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · United States v. Matlock · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · Palmer v. Hoffman · Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here are only two requirements for admissibility under FRE 801(d)(2)(A) : a statement was made by a party, and the statement was offered against that party”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“statement is offered against an opposing party and ... was made by the party in an individual or representative capacity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.