Castro v. Terhune’s Empirical Analysis
712 F.3d 1304 · 2013
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3626 (§ 20409 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)
Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Turner v. Safley · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Connally v. General Construction Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Some evidence” review requires us to ask only whether there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion. This test is minimally stringent. Accordingly, we do not examine the entire record, independently assess witness credibility, or reweigh the evidence. Evidence only must bear some indicia of reliability to be considered “some evidence.” Moreover, evidence may qualify as “some evidence,” even if it does not logically preclude! ] any conclusion but the one reached.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dorrough v. Ruff
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.