Teta v. Chow’s Empirical Analysis
712 F.3d 886 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 503 · 28 U.S.C. § 1930 (§ 246 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (Title 11)) · 29 U.S.C. § 2101 (§ 2 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 2102 (§ 3 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 2104 (§ 5 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act)
Relies on American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah · Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. Parker · Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp. · Eaton v. Hobson · Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.