Sterling v. Shulkin’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 7266 · 38 U.S.C. § 7292
Relies on Jaquay v. Principi · Barrett v. Principi · Bailey v. Principi · Sneed v. Shinseki · Checo v. Shinseki
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Veterans Court to consider whether the facts of this case warrant equitable tolling”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. James v. Wilkie“erred by not considering whether equitable tolling should apply”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. James v. Wilkie
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.