Kashi v. Gratsos’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2011
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Argento v. Village of Melrose Park · Kashi v. Gratsos · ABKCO Industries, Inc. v. Apple Films, Inc. · Marshak v. Green · Duchek v. Jacobi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Rule 69] does no more than establish a system of procedure for federal district courts. Neither this rule nor state law create or withdraw the district court’s jurisdiction to enforce its judgment.”); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 82 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“obviate the need for a plenary action.... This special 'turnover' proceeding is ... sufficient to resolve the parties rights in the disputed property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]his 'turnover' proceeding is properly initiated under New York law and [the creditor] is not required to ... bring a plenary action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.