Buzzard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2011
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 166 Ind. App. 199 - Merry v. State · Morgan v. State · Ingram v. State · Davidson v. State · Tillman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(al sentence enhancement will be affirmed in spite of a trial court's failure to specifically articulate its reasons if the record indicates that the court engaged in the evaluative processes....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Plummer v. State · Powell v. State“[It is difficult for children to remember specific dates, particularly when the incident is not immediately reported as is often the situation in child molesting cases. The exact date becomes important only in limited cireumstances, including the case where the victim's age at the time of the offense falls at or near the dividing line between classes of felonies.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Garner v. State · Giddings v. State“the time of the offense is not of the essence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Giddings v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.