Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
May 2011
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Marshall v. State · Williams v. State · Willsey v. State · Fields v. State · 182 Ind. App. 424 - Ringley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Relevant evidence' means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. King v. State · Kimbrough v. State“may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. King v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.