People v. Farley’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2024
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Allen v. United States · 36 Cal. 3d 236 - People v. Bledsoe · State v. Marks · State v. Saldana · State v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a witness has personally observed the physical activity of another, and summarizes his ‘sensory impressions thereof,’ the witness' [s] conclusions are admissible.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“either believed the victim or that [the vie-tim] had been raped.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Acosta“And based upon your observations, what was her state of mind?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Acosta
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.