Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 P2D 211 - State v. Knoll

State v. Knoll’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Low (2008), 2013 UT App 213 - State v. Campos (2013)

30 state decisions

12019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 98 Wash. 2d 484 - State v. McCullum · State v. Torres · State v. Wilson · State v. Starks · State v. Curtis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen there is a basis in the evidence, whether the evidence is produced by the prosecution or by the defendant, which would provide some reasonable basis for the jury to conclude that a killing was done to protect the defendant from an imminent threat of death by another, an instruction on self-defense should be given the jury.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] person is justified in using force which is intended or likely to cause death or serious bodily injury only if he reasonably believes that the force is necessary to prevent death or serious bodily injury to himself or a third person, or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “constituted a correct statement of the law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.