Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 P2D 220 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2010

20 state decisions

901985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Petree · State v. Lamm · Salazar v. State · State v. Lesley · State v. Creviston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In considering a claim of insufficiency of the evidence, “we review the evidence and all inferences which may reasonably be drawn from it in the light most favorable to the verdict of the jury. We reverse a jury conviction for insufficient evidence only when the evidence, so viewed, is sufficiently inconclusive or inherently improbable that reasonable minds must have entertained a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime of which he [or she] was convicted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that the check, along with two other checks, had been taken from the office located in his home. He further testified that he did not know defendant, had never employed him, did not owe him money, and that he had not written the check nor authorized anyone to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “evidence . . . was available to defendant but not obtained by him”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.