712 So. 2d 525 - State v. Lisotta’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Nicholas v. United States · Hernandez v. United States · 683 So. 2d 218 - State v. Strickland · 495 So. 2d 1306 - State v. Griffin · State v. Doby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“You're also going to hear from Deputy Kuhn that this defendant made several statements at the time that he was arrested denying certain things, saying things that the State intends to show, prove, that he's guilty, exactly what we say he's guilty of.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The state shall not, in the opening statement, advert in any way to a confession or inculpatory statement made by the defendant unless the statement has been previously ruled admissible in the case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.