712 So. 2d 762 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State (2000), 760 So. 2d 924 - Trapp v. State (2000)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 668 So. 2d 589 - State v. Hart · 674 So. 2d 123 - Justice v. State · Guinn v. State · Vasquez v. State · 688 So. 2d 909 - Brock v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is a judicial policy that the actual oral imposition of sanctions should prevail over any subsequent written order to the contrary”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“SHOULD THE REQUIREMENT THAT A DEFENDANT PAY FOR DRUG TESTING BE TREATED AS A GENERAL CONDITION OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09(6), FLORIDA STATUTES (1995), OR SHOULD IT BE TREATED AS A SPECIAL CONDITION THAT REQUIRES ORAL ANNOUNCEMENT?”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he requirement that a defendant pay for drug testing is a special condition of probation which the trial court must pronounce orally at sentencing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.