McCambridge v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
134 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 136 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Heitman v. State (1991), McFarland v. State (1996)
134 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Wade · Edwards v. Arizona · Schmerber v. State of California · Rhode Island v. Innis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ttorneys, when briefing constitutional questions, should carefully separate federal and state issues into separate grounds and provide substantive analysis or argument on each separate ground. If sufficient distinction between state and federal constitutional grounds is not provided by counsel, this Court may overrule the ground as multifarious”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Dees v. State · Luquis v. State“17. A different question might be presented if the police officer, in ignoring appellant's request for counsel under Miranda , had mixed his request for a breath sample with questions that amounted to interrogation. In the absence of such a probable Miranda violation, we need not decide under what circumstances a suspect's consent to provide a breath sample is the fruit of an illegal interrogation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Garcia v. State · Jamail v. State“[W]e do not imply that a remedy will never be available to a suspect who is confused when faced with Miranda warnings and a breath testing decision without the benefit of requested counsel.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Jamail v. State · Jamail v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.