Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 SW2D 512 - Farris v. State

Farris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2007
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2007

14 state decisions

70198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hammett v. State · Carrillo v. State · Guzman v. State · Evans v. State · Resnick v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An appellate court may not rely upon an invalid supplement to a record in deciding a defendant's appeal; an appellate court is limited to those portions of the record which have been properly approved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “only if the documents or testimony in the separate case originally could have been included in the record on appeal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.