Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 S.W.2d 566 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2008

4 state decisions

20198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whitten v. State · Ex Parte McAtee · Fann v. State · Milczanowski v. State · Harrison v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Prior to accepting a plea of guilty or a plea of nolo contendere, the court shall admonish the defendant of: (1) the range of punishment attached to the offense; (2) the fact that the recommendation of the prosecuting attorney as to punishment is not binding on the court; ****** (3) the fact that if the punishment assessed does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant and his attorney, the trial court must give its permission to the defendant before he may prosecute an appeal on any matter in the case except for those matters raised by written motion filed prior to trial; and (4) the fact that if the defendant is not a citizen of the United States of America, a plea of guilty or nolo contendere for the offense charged may result in deportation, the exclusion from admission to this country, or the denial of naturalization under federal law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Smith v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.