Johnson v. Edmonds’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Moody (1992), Vannerson v. Vannerson (1993)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc. · Folsom Investments, Inc. v. Troutz · Butler v. Dal Tex MacH. & Tool Co., Inc. · Muenster Manufacturing Co. v. Muenster Industrial Foundation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The rule as expressed in Craddock, 133 S.W.2d at 126 , requires the appellant to demonstrate that his failure to appear was not intentional or the result of conscious indifference.” If the term conscious indifference, as used in the cases, means anything, it must mean something other than an intentional failure to appear. We interpret conscious indifference to mean a failure to take some action which would seem indicated to a person of reasonable sensibilities under the same circumstances. Johnson, 712 S.W.2d at 652-653 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.