Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 712 SW2D 822 - Escalona v. Combs

Escalona v. Combs’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 164th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Hanson v. Denckla · O'Brien v. Lanpar Company · Houston First American Savings v. Musick · Mitchim v. Mitchim

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Defendant’s business in Texas would put a reasonable person on notice that he was subject to the call of a Texas court; and 2. The quality and quantity of defendant’s business in Texas must have conferred on Texas courts either: a. Specific jurisdiction: (1) Defendant purposefully did some act or completed some transaction in Texas; (2) which gave rise to plaintiff’s cause of action, or was connected with that act or transaction; or b. General jurisdiction: Defendant had continuing and systematic contacts with Texas; and 3. The assumption of jurisdiction by Texas courts must not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.