Crowe Associates Inc Crowe Associates Inc v. Bricklayers and Masons Union Local No of Detroit Michigan’s Empirical Analysis
713 F.2d 211 · 1983
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably Computer Communications, Inc. v. Codex Corp. (1987), MCorp Financial, Inc. v. Board of Governors Federal Reserve System of the United States (1990)
13 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770 · Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana Railroad · Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. · Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Lyman Lamb Co. · United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“anti-injunction provisions of the Norris-LaGuardia Act were intended to protect workers in the exercise of organized economic power.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“No restraining order or temporary or permanent injunction shall be granted in a case involving or growing out of a labor dispute, except on the basis of findings of fact made and filed by the court in the record of the case prior to the issuance of such restraining order or injunction; and every restraining order or injunction ... shall include a prohibition of such - specific act or acts as may be expressly complained of in the bill of complaint or petition filed in such case....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“self-evident proof that Congress never intended to supersede or transcend [the Norris-LaGuardia Act], since we cannot believe that the Norris-LaGuardia Act was to be superseded sub silentio.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.