United States v. Poe’s Empirical Analysis
713 F.2d 579 · 1983
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2009
17 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Oregon v. Kennedy · United States v. Morrison · United States v. Robuck · United States v. Hines
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Prosecutorial conduct that might be viewed as . . . overreaching, even if sufficient to justify a mistrial on defendant's motion, . . . does not bar retrial absent intent on the part of the prosecutor to subvert the protections afforded by the Double Jeopardy Clause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The general rule is that where ... a defendant requests a mistrial, the Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar a retrial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.