United States v. Patterson’s Empirical Analysis
713 F.3d 1237 · 2013
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4241 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Bruton v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Allen v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[B]ecause these statements were made in furtherance of a conspiracy, they are nontestimonial and present no Sixth Amendment problem.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[u]nder Rule 28(a)(9)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, an appellant must present in his brief his ‘contentions and reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant relies.’ Further, parties appearing before this court cannot satisfy Rule 28 by incorporating their claims by reference to ... records from the court below.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[allowing litigants to adopt district court filings would provide an effective means of circumventing the page limitations on briefs set forth in the appellate rules and unnecessarily complicate the task of an appellate judge. Consequently, we adhere to our rule that arguments not set forth fully in the opening brief are waived.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.