Arnzen v. Palmer’s Empirical Analysis
713 F.3d 369 · 2013
Citation profile
5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Schmerber v. State of California · Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. Romeo · Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. · Brigham City v. Stuart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]nvoluntarily civilly committed persons retain the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches that is analogous to the right retained by pretrial detainees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“substantial evidence showing [that the MSOP's] policies are an unnecessary or unjustified response to problems of institutional security,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“strictly apply a 'less intrusive means' test.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.