Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 713 NE2D 288 - Slutsky v. Crews

Slutsky v. Crews’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2018

9 state decisions

100199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jarboe v. Landmark Community Newspapers of Indiana, Inc. · Sullivan v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. · Jordan v. Deery · Shell Oil Co. v. Meyer · Tofany v. NBS Imaging Systems, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the court must consider whether the party against whom the judgment is pled had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue and whether it would be otherwise unfair under the circumstances to permit the use of collateral estoppel.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “bars subsequent relitigation of the same fact or issue where that fact or issue was necessarily adjudicated in a former suit and the same fact or issue is presented in a subsequent cause of action”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.