Taylor v. Duke’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Burrell v. Meads · 35 Wash. App. 324 - Jarr v. Seeco Construction Co. · Witham v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. · Dunifon v. Iovino · McCormick v. State, Department of Natural Resources
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“omission or failure to act when the actor has actual knowledge of the natural and probable consequence of injury and has opportunity to avoid that risk,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“so grossly deviant from everyday standards that the licensee or trespasser cannot be expected to anticipate it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“had knowledge of an impending danger or consciousness of misconduct calculated to result in probable injury,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.