Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 713 P2D 259 - Robison v. Francis

Robison v. Francis’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
April 1999
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Michigan v. Long · Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowers · Toomer v. Witsell · Paul v. Virginia · Sugarman v. Dougall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact that ... a statute [may] satisfy the requirement[s] of the United States Constitution does not mean that the same statute will pass muster under ... the Alaska Constitution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Id. [465 U.S.] at 222, 104 S.Ct. at 1030 , 79 L.Ed.2d at 261 . While Alaska's unemployment is chronically high due in large part to unique conditions in rural areas, the economy of the state does not seem remotely comparable to the picture of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “non-residents from public construction jobs so that more jobs will be available to Alaskans ... is not a permissible justification for discrimination under the privileges and immunities clause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.