Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 713 P2D 366 - White v. MacFarlane

White v. MacFarlane’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2026

7 state decisions

3019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Maestas v. District Court · People v. Treat · Hunter v. District Ct. in & for Twentieth Jud. Dist. · People v. Quinn · Kuypers v. DISTRICT COURT FORFOURTH JUD. DIST.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A district court, however, may review the county court's pretrial procedural decisions under an abuse of discretion standard”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] defendant seeking to challenge an erroneous ruling on probable cause may seek extraordinary relief under C.A.R. 21.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “district court does not have jurisdiction to reopen or reconsider a county court's probable cause determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.