Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2000
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Booth v. Maryland · Cook v. State · Mikenas v. State · 522 So. 2d 963 - Ray v. State · 699 So. 2d 1343 - Robertson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To allow a conviction of burglary based on the facts in this case would erode the consent section of the statute to a point where it was surplusage ... This is not an appropriate construction of the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marquez v. State“There must be some evidence the jury can rationally rely on to infer that consent was withdrawn besides the fact that a crime occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marquez v. State“any burglary conviction must be bottomed on proof that consent to `remaining in' has been withdrawn.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marquez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.