713 So. 2d 1035 - Isaac v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Petition of Graham ex rel. Nine Condemned Men v. State · 472 So. 2d 738 - Williams v. State · 499 So. 2d 24 - James v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he record demonstrate[d] that an appointed lawyer would not have aided [the defendant] in demonstrating that he was entitled to a new trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“afforded an evidentiary hearing about a matter that was not complex and that did not require extensive legal research”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.