Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 713 SO2D 1079 - Zelaya v. State

Zelaya v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Flint v. State · Sanders v. State · 697 So. 2d 961 - Chamness v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The obvious intent of the conditions imposed on appellant was that he either be at work or at home. When the driver, over whom he had no control, decided to go into the store, appellant was left with the choice of staying with his • crew and going into the store, or remaining alone in the truck. We conclude that his choosing to stay with his crew was neither a willful nor substantial violation, and his purchase of shoes while in the store was not substantial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.